Black & White in the Era of Colour.
Lecturer — Ksenia Golubovich, writer and culturologist
Part 1. Rhythm and Radiance: Two Poles of 20th Century Cinema
Cinema and photography are technical arts that emerged in the 19th century but truly came into their own in the 20th. Walter Benjamin argued that cinema strips the image of its “aura” — its uniqueness and irreproducibility — replacing it with the effect of shock. This shock resembles something military: suddenness, rhythm, the destruction of the old world. Cinema shows the masses as movement, as rhythm from above — columns, cities, machines. Eisenstein, Rodchenko, Vetrov built their frames as a sequence of “heavy bodies” — palaces, ships, crowds. This is the rhythm of mass advance.
But there was another pole — radiance. The old aristocratic world seemed to be fading, yet it migrated into cinema: into the cult of film stars, into scenes from the past, into black-and-white splendour. Black-and-white cinema became a space of wonder, fairy tale, and reverie. A world where actresses look like living jewels, and colour — when it does appear — is perceived as the shimmer of gemstones. It is no coincidence that the film The Stone Flower was awarded for its colour at Cannes.
Part 2. Colour and Black-and-White: A Division of Meaning
With the arrival of colour, cinema moved closer to private life, becoming more “everyday”. Black-and-white, meanwhile, became the space of experiment, sharpness, and authenticity. Within it lies freedom for error, for chronicle, for chance. Colour “paints over” reality — black-and-white reveals it.
This is the cinema of German, Pasolini, Godard. In Breathless, the camera almost becomes the body of the hero — running, falling in love, coming to awareness here and now, as if in a documentary shoot. Yet this does not negate depth: the hero is simultaneously alive and the embodiment of noir myth.